A  Critical Analysis Of The Plausibility Of Miracles in Contemporary Nigeria Based on C. Lewis’  Philosophy of Miracles

Authors

  • Utazi Benignus Zereuwa Prince Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.66811/4jbzjm81

Keywords:

miracle, critical analysis, C. S. Lewis, religious experience, Nigeria

Abstract

This study critically examines the plausibility of miracles within contemporary Nigeria through the philosophical framework of C. S. Lewis. While Nigeria remains a deeply religious society with widespread claims of miraculous interventions, these claims often oscillate between authentic religious experience and manipulative religious practices. Drawing on Lewis’ distinction between naturalism and supernaturalism, this paper interrogates whether belief in miracles is philosophically defensible within a modern African context shaped by scientific rationality and socio-religious dynamics. Using philosophical analysis and qualitative interviews, the study argues that Lewis’ conception of miracles as divine interruptions of natural laws provides a coherent framework for evaluating miracle claims. However, the Nigerian context introduces complexities such as commercialization of religion and epistemic challenges. The study concludes that while miracles remain philosophically plausible, critical discernment is necessary to distinguish genuine occurrences from socio-religious constructions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Utazi Benignus Zereuwa Prince

    Department of Philosophy, Chukwuemeka Odumegwu Ojukwu University, Anambra State

References

Adedibu, B. A. (2023). Nigerian Pentecostal megachurches and development. Religions, 14(1).

Ademiluka, S. O. (2023). Assessing the quest for miracles in Nigeria. Theologia Viatorum, 47(1).

Afolabi, O. O., et al. (2023). Commoditization of God. Journal of Pentecostal and Charismatic Christianity.

Alston, W. P. (1991). Perceiving God. Cornell University Press.

Asamoah-Gyadu, J.K. (2015). Contemporary Pentecostal Christianity: Interpreting from an African context. Regnum Books International.

Boudry, M & Braeckman, J. (2011) De ongelovige Thomas heft een punt: Een handieding voor kritisch Denken. Boom (Amsterdam).

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.

Earman, J. (2000). Hume’s abject failure. Oxford University Press.

Fogelin, R. (2003). A defense of Hume on miracles. Princeton University Press.

Gifford, P. (2015). Christianity, development and modernity in Africa. Hurst.

Granqvist, P., & Kirkpatrick, L. (2020). Attachment and religion. Guilford Press.

Hume, D. (2007). An enquiry concerning human understanding. Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1748)

Keener, C. S. (2011). Miracles today. Baker Academic.

Larmer, R. (2013). The legitimacy of miracle. Lexington Books.

Lewis, C. S. (2001). Miracles. HarperOne.

Marshall, R. (2019). Political spiritualities. University of Chicago Press.

McGrew, T., & McGrew, L. (2014). The argument from miracles. Philosophy Compass.

Taliaferro, C. (2019). Philosophy of religion. Routledge.

Obadare, E. (2018). Pentecostal republic. Zed Books.

Oppy, G. (2018). Atheism and Agnosticism. Cambridge.

Ukah, A. (2008). The Redeemed Christian Church of God. Journal of Religion in Africa, 38(2), 123–145.

Ukah, A. (2020). African Pentecostalism. Oxford University Press.

Wiebe, P. (2020). God and other spirits. Oxford University Press.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-30

How to Cite

A  Critical Analysis Of The Plausibility Of Miracles in Contemporary Nigeria Based on C. Lewis’  Philosophy of Miracles. (2026). EIJRIHS, 1(2), 104-117. https://doi.org/10.66811/4jbzjm81

Similar Articles

21-21 of 21

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.