Peer Review Policy

All papers submitted to the Eagle International Journal of Research, Innovation and Health Sciences are subjected to double‑blind peer review process to maintain the quality, originality and relevance of material published in it. The identities of both reviewers and authors are kept confidential throughout this process.

Manuscripts are initially screened and checked by the editorial team to ensure they lie within the journal’s scope and basic submission standards. Submissions with some potential are then sent out to a minimum of two independent reviewers who are subject experts.

Reviewers assess manuscripts in terms of clarity of presentation, originality, scientific accuracy, methodological rigour and contribution to the field. Based on the reviews, a manuscript may be recommended for acceptance, acceptance with minor revision, major revision or rejection.

The Editor‑in‑Chief makes the final decision based on reviewers’ recommendations. Authors are promptly informed, and if appropriate, offered an opportunity to revise and resubmit their manuscript. The Journal seeks to complete peer review within two weeks of submission.